Forming a Hypothesis Concerning the
9/11 Catastrophe


Author
Capitalist Genocide   Keys to 9/11 Commonwealth Communities
Class Warfare Replace Capitalism   Capitalist Murder



     If you're personally going to make sense of the 9/11/2001 World Trade Center/Pentagon catastrophe, you must dare to think the "unthinkable." Why, because the Demonic Cabal which has been the controlling power behind most Democratic and Republican administrations since the beginning decades of the twentieth century, has no trouble thinking and carrying out the unthinkable:


  • Forcing America into the 1991 Gulf War, the Afghanistan War, the Iraq War, the attack against Libya and now Syria and Iran, to reconfigure the Middle East and establish a war-profiteering nightmare

  • Creating a plan, approved by all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, titled "Operation Northwoods":

    • Devising a military operation involving the murder of American civilians as a way to create a pretext for a military operation against Cuba

    • Including in the plan assassinations and bombings in American cities, blowing up American ships in Cuban harbors, hijacking American airplanes

    • Counting on the fact that "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation"

  • Creating plans for nuclear first strike military actions in Iran

  • Cannibalizing Americans through the subprime mortgage swindle

  • Bailing out large banks while leaving American homeowners with foreclosure and financial ruin, leading to homelessness, abject poverty, and death


          Among many other intelligent persons, Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III, recently in charge of all American military intelligence, believes that no airplane hit the Pentagon and that the twin towers went down from controlled demolition. The whole 9/11 catastrophe, in other words, was a false-flag operation, the truth of which is being kept from the American public by a controlled press.

     In regard to 9/11, there are two main hypotheses, with sub-hypotheses branching out from them:

  1. The Bush administration was complicit in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon

    • They were complicit in not paying attention to clear warnings of terrorist attacks

    • They were complicit in planning and carrying out the attacks

  2. The Bush administration was not complicit

    • They were not complicit but they were derelict in their duty in failing to heed warning signs and take appropriate counter-measures

    • They were not complicit at all

Complicit or Not?


     The Bush administration, the rabid right, and even some reputedly left-leaning liberals warned Americans that any serious consideration of the hypothesis that 9/11 was a Bush conspiracy was a flight into lunacy.

      However, even some sources within the Bush administration were indicating the distinct possibility of complicity:

"A report released 6/9/05 by the FBI's Office of the Inspector General raised new questions about the role of the US government in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The internal FBI study provided several important revelations about how US intelligence agencies ignored and even suppressed warnings in the period leading up to the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that killed nearly 3,000 people." 1
      The former chief economist for the Department of Labor during Bush's first term, Morgan Reynolds, commented in June, 2005 that the official story about the collapse of the WTC was "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds said there is evidence that this was an "inside job." 2

   Gore Vidal's essay 'The Enemy Within' was published on October 27, 2002 in the print edition of The Observer. In it Vidal claims that what he calls a "Bush junta" planned and carried out the terrorist attacks as a pretext to enact a pre-existing agenda to invade Afghanistan and attack civil liberties in the U.S.

"We still don't know by whom we were struck that infamous Tuesday, or for what true purpose. But it is fairly plain to many civil libertarians that 9/11 put paid not only to much of our fragile Bill of Rights but also to our once-envied system of government which had taken a mortal blow the previous year when the Supreme Court did a little dance in 5/4 time and replaced a popularly elected President with the oil and gas Bush-Cheney junta."

     A number of level-headed people, including former Bush counter-terrorism coordinator Richard Clarke, seriously asked if the Bush administration did all it could have to prevent the 9/11 tragedy. The 9/11 Commission was a ploy to protect the Bush Junta from the people. The Commission struggled against great obstacles put up primarily by the Bush administration, then issued a report that was a total coverup. In the early part of April 2004, at least one poll showed that 70% of Americans believed Bush knew of 9/11 in advance. A June, 2005 MSNBC poll found that 94% of Americans believe Bush misled the nation in order to go to war with Iraq.


You Can't Bury Your Head in the Sand

     Even if you don't think that there's enough evidence to conclude that 9/11 was a cabal conspiracy, you need to:


Self-Informed Citizens Want to Know


      None of us likes to think that our own government would deliberately carry out a murderous attack on its own people. But that hypothesis has to be given equal weight with the theory that the Bush administration was not complicit in 9/11. The Downing Street memo and related material now clearly show that Bush and Blair deliberately lied to their people to initiate the pre-emptive Iraq war. We need to consider all relevant sub-hypotheses in coming to an informed opinion.

      My personal opinion is that, with the evidence now available to us, the hypothesis with the most foundation is that the international cabal and its Bush junta puppets planned and carried out the 9/11 horror to make it possible to institute a police state in the United States and continue its efforts toward military and economic world domination.

     In the coming years, you're going to have to respond to what the cabal does through its capitalist cabal puppet regimes. You can only respond sensibly if you have at least a working hypothesis about what's really going on in the world, including what you think happened on 9/11/2001. Intelligent behavior involves analyzing the problems and issues facing us to find an acceptable theoretical solution which we then test in practice.

     Once we outline the viable, relevant hypotheses, we must look at all the facts and see which hypothesis is supported with the preponderance of evidence. In trying to figure out the 9/11 phenomenon, we're not going to find many "smoking guns" (though perhaps you will find more than you might suppose at first glance).

      As America has been taken over by the capitalist cabal, it's clear that even considering the possibility that 9/11 was a false-flag operation" is going to be considered an act redolent of treason.

      The cabal is trying to make us believe that any hypothesis but the "official" one is a crazed conspiracy theory.

    Many Americans are not even aware that a third tower was brought down through controlled demolition on 9/11/2001.

      The cabal now manipulates the American mind by providing clear hints of what kinds of terrorist outrages it plans to perpetrate. This kind of mental conditioning is called predictive programming, and is being used to give hints to American and world citizens as to upcoming falseflag operations.

    To understand 9/11, follow the inside trading on prior knowledge of 9/11.

     My purpose in this essay is to provide a framework for thought in trying to make sense of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, not to review the evidence which supports or disproves the hypotheses and sub-hypotheses.

     I encourage you to dare to think the unthinkable wherever it may take you. Don't let either right-wing reactionaries or pseudo-liberals frighten you from making up your own mind as to just what happened on September 11, 2001.

     It's up to us to consider these questions as if our lives depend on them--because they do.






First posted: September, 2002      Last updated: 9/13/2016


Notes:

1 FBI inspector general's report: more evidence of government complicity in 9/11 attacks

2 WTC Collapse Due to Controlled Demolition, an "Inside Job," says Former Bush Advisor


Updates:

  • August, 2009: Patriots question 9/11 scam

  • 5/22/2008: US Military Officers Challenge Official 9/11 Account

  • 7/14/05: Coleen Rowley: Why I Support a New 9/11 Investigation

  • 6/14/05: 9/11 Oddities--many links

  • 4/12/04: Was the Bush Administration Complicit in 9/11?

  • 4/12/024: 9/11 Attack Information

  • 4/12/04: 9/11 Attack Information (of all sorts)

  • 10/27/02: Gore Vidal claims 'Bush junta' complicit in 9/11

  • 7/19/02: The Enemy Is Inside The Gates

  • A Useful Hypothesis in Ferreting out Reality