|
| It's difficult for us to grasp the full significance of the cabal's
control over both political parties, as well as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of our government.
|
|
|
| We keep thinking that
conditions for American workers will inevitably improve if we
just vote a new bunch of leaders in--as somewhat happened in the 2006 mid-term election.
| |
"If the elections of November 7 [2006] were an expression of the sentiments of the broad mass of the
American people, then the announcement just two months later by Bush of his administration’s 'new strategy' in Iraq demonstrated
above all the completely hollowed-out and decayed character of American . . . democracy. In the face of an overwhelming
rejection of the Iraq war, the Bush regime will not only step up its military operations in Iraq but has openly threatened a
wider war against Iran and Syria, involving the whole of the Middle East—threats that were repeated in Bush’s State of the
Union speech yesterday [2/11/07]." 1
|

|
| Situation in
Washington: Potemkin Village
"Political life in the US capital is increasingly an exercise in deceit and self-delusion. It does not take long for an
objective observer to discern that behind the traditional forms of parliamentary democracy—congressional debates, floor
votes, hearings, etc.—the machinery of a presidential dictatorship is being consolidated and already operating in key
areas of policy, both foreign and domestic.
"The Bush administration has successfully asserted, due largely to the compliance of a complicit and cowardly Democratic
Party and a corrupt media, a degree of unchecked and unaccountable power that is unprecedented in US history. On the basis
of the pseudo-constitutional theory of the 'unitary executive' and the supposed war-time powers of the commander-in-chief
(in the undeclared, unlimited and phony 'war on terror'), the right-wing clique around the White House routinely violates
constitutional norms and legal statutes, snubs Congress and takes actions that flagrantly violate the democratic rights of
the American people." 2 | |
We voted in the mid-term 2006
mid-term election for Congress to get us out of Iraq and to enact such measures as an increase in the minimum wage.
The House has done nothing but pass a non-binding resolution about Dubya's troop
escalation, the Senate voted down a similar toothless resolution. The bills for increasing the minimum wage include
tax cuts of over $8 billion for the top 1% of obscenely wealthy Americans.
"The [non-binding] resolution and the three days of debate that preceded its passage are a
further demonstration that the Democratic Party shares the imperialist goals of the Bush administration in Iraq, and that its
criticisms are entirely on the level of tactics. In a literal sense, the resolution is not an antiwar measure at all, but merely
a statement of disagreement with the method chosen by the White House to continue and escalate the war."
3
|
"I think what we're talking about with the Bush administration is a far different matter in which disinformation, misinformation
and unwillingness to tell the truth - a willingness to lie both in the Oval Office, in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, in
the office of the vice president, the vice president himself - is something that I have never witnessed before on this scale.
"The lying in the Nixon White House had most often to do with covering up Watergate, with the Nixon administration's illegal
activities. Here, in this presidency, there is an unwillingness to be truthful, both contextually and in terms of basic facts
that ought to be of great concern to people of all ideologies . . .
"This president has a record of dishonesty and obfuscation that is Nixonian in character in its willingness to manipulate
the press, to manipulate the truth. We have gone to war on the basis of misinformation, disinformation and knowing lies from
top to bottom."
Carl Bernstein on Nixon vs. Bush
InterviewEditor & Publisher, Wednesday 14 February 2007
|
|
|
The cabal has been in almost total control of the entire US political-economic-social structure since
their assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963. During the 60s, 70s, and 80s, their decimation of Constitutional liberties
was slow but sure. Beginning with the Nixon criminal presidency, they rapidly accelerated the speed of
undermining basic American freedoms. |
Their quintessential tactic was ignoring all reports of an impending terrorist attack and then using the 9/11 catastrophe as the excuse for
unending war, both foreign and domestic.
Neanderthal ideologues now claim that the President has totally unfettered power to attack any part of
the Constitution he chooses--in the interest of "national security."
Thinking Americans are going to have to reconstitute our political, economic, and social structures on
our own. And right now, the number of well-informed, intelligent Americans is a small minority of the entire population.
Prime Example of the Idiocy of Most of the American Press
Tim Russert: "Everyone knows Social Security, as it's constructed, is not going to be in the same place it's going to be for the next generation, Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives."
Chris Matthews: "It's a bad Ponzi scheme, at this point."
Tim Russert: "Yes." |
Tactics for Reconstituting America
Our specific tactics in transforming America must be as well-conceived as our
overall strategies.
We'll have to make a concerted effort to understand what's occurring in the world at the present time and adapt our
actions to pivotal contingencies. Over the long run we'll need to reconstitute our
election system into one which allows for a diversity of parties and is free from
the fraud which now plagues our nation. The evidence is
clear that the Republicans, under the command of Karl Rove, stole the 2000, 2002,
2004 elections. They rigged the 2006 mid-term election as well, but did such a
lousy job that the Democrats won both houses of
Congress.
The day after the 2006 mid-term election, Al Franken (a self-proclaimed progressive) told his Air America
audience that the outcome proved that the Republicans never steal elections--never have and never will. As you might guess,
Al has now decided to run for senator from Minnesota.
Al isn't the only self-styled progressive who hasn't the guts to face the fact that the Republicans
have stolen elections beginning in 2000. The Nation magazine and such supposedly liberal Internet blogs as Daily Kos refused to
even consider that this could have happened. Fortunately, we have intrepid investigative reporters such as Greg Palast and
commentators like Robert
F. Kennedy, Jr. who present clear and persuasive evidence of vote fraud to the American public.
As long as there are tactical
reasons for ensuring voting integrity in America--electing the few progressive Democratic candidates available--we must put
energy into making certain elections are fair.
Some people suggest that we either begin voting for third party candidates across the board or not vote
at all--to show our contempt for the entire criminal voting enterprise. In those instances where there's no significant difference
between the Democratic and Republican candidates, it may be the best strategy to vote for a third party nominee. We'll have to study
the democratic candidates very carefully to see if there are any positive elements which would make voting for them the best course.
It will be necessary to study each candidate on his or her own merits and not assume that the label of "liberal democrat" is
a genuine one, as in the case of the turncoat
freshman Congressman Christopher Carney of Pennsylvania.
Our tactics in reconstituting America must be
based on realistic appraisal of our national condition coupled with long-range, persistent efforts founded on confidence in our
ultimate victory. |
Positive Politicians
Contrary to the simple-minded, wholesale dismissal of the entire American political system by some,
we must recognize that there are still some members of the Democratic party who have some positive qualities and work
for some initiatives that further the good of working-class American citizens.
  In discovering who those progressive
Democrats are we can use three criteria:
- If they have spoken out directly against Bush in general and his Iraq war in particular
- If they voted against S256, the destructive bankruptcy bill that squeezes common citizens,
making it more difficult for working families who are experiencing financial difficulties to get relief through the bankruptcy
process. This unfair bill tilted the bankruptcy process in favor of banks and credit card companies,
and against the interests
of workers who have lost their jobs or been hit with high medical bills. The measure passed 74 to 25 in Senate and 302 to 126
in the House.
|
|
| |
|
- If they voted for H.R. 2: Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007. The bill passed the Senate 94 to 3 and the House by 315 to 116.
Member of Congress
Disallowing Bankruptcy (S256)
Raising Minimum Wage (HR2)
Representative John Conyers, Jr.NoYes
Representative Sheila Jackson-LeeNoYes
Representative Dennis KucinichNoYes
Representative Nancy PelosiNoYes
Representative Henry WaxmanNoYes
Senator Barbara BoxerNoYes
Senator Russ FeingoldNoYes
Senator Ted KennedyNoYes
Senator Bernie SandersNoYes
Senator Diane FeinsteinNoYes
Senator Jim WebbNAYes
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Some interesting discoveries come out of this analysis:
- Not a single Republican member of Congress can pass this test
- Hillary Clinton refused to vote on the anti-bankruptcy bill, revealing once again that she's a shill for the
corporations; her refusal to admit that her vote for the Iraq war was a mistake means that she's essentially a Republican in
Democratic clothing (as is Joseph Lieberman a Republican in Independent clothing)
- Representative John Murtha, Representative Ron Paul, Senator Robert Byrd and Senator Harry Reid voted for the anti-bankruptcy
bill
- Diane Feinstein voted appropriately on the two measures, but her criticism of Bush and the Iraq war has been half-hearted and
inconsistent at best; however, her February, 2007 protest against the Bush junta's firing of 10 progressive US district judges merits commendation
- Jim Webb's criticism of Bush and the Iraq war during his election campaign was very vocal, but his voting record is as yet
inconclusive. His recent speech (1/23/07) warning against
deepening disparity between the rich and the
poor is a good first effort.
- Barak Obama voted appropriately on
the two measures, but we know very little about his basic convictions, plus he's
already tainted by corruption charges (see below) and is siding with the Bush junta in calling for an attack on Iran.
- Out of 535 members of Congress, only 11 qualify as having some positive qualities and furthering some progressive causes.
This proves how overpowering the demonic cabal's power is over Congress. Only 2.06% of those in Congress have some degree of
independence from the campaign-money bribery and corruption of the cabal corporations.
I'm aware that apart from Feingold, the other members of this august
group have voted for some anti-progressive initiatives and nominees and have numerous personal views that run counter to
working-class interests. Even Conyers in February, 2007 reneged on his earlier pledge to bring impeachment charges against Bush.
But the important thing is that there is not a single Republican representative or senator who can be included on that list.
So, even though we can say that for the
large majority of members of Congress there's not a dab of difference between Republicans and Democrats, there are some Democrats
with some positive qualities and some record of working for the wellbeing of common American citizens. That's why
maintaining election integrity remains an important task for progressives.
Why America Must Be Reconstituted In America, every 2 minutes a baby is born into poverty. Every 7 minutes a baby is born
at low birth weight. Every 15 minutes a baby is born to a mother who received late or no prenatal care. Every hour a baby dies
before turning one. |
Looking Ahead to the 2008 Election
John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama represent the kind of "bait and switch" 4 scam that
the cabal and its Republican and Democratic Party lackeys are already pulling in regard to the 2008 election. All three candidates are agents of the criminal cabal which seized control of America in the early decades of the twentieth century. This cabal "smoke and mirrors" 5 tactic of controlling both Democratic and Republican politicians has been one of their hallmarks.
We must make certain that we're not taken in by such counterfeit Democratic and Republican candidates in the 2008 presidential election. We already suffered from the cabal ringer 6 John Kerry going back on his promise to contest the stolen 2004 election, standing in solidarity with his Skull-and-Bones brother, George W. Bush.
John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama have long records of underhanded activity, so we can be sure
they'll continue the reign of corruption the cabal has perpetrated over the last century. Whether it's John McCain's savings and loan and Abramoff-related crimes, Hillary's criminal connections to Johnny Chung and Vina Gupta, or Obama's sleazy connection to a now-indicted political fundraiser, Tony Rezko and Obama's anti-American pastor, Jeremiah Wright, any one of them will clearly continue in the cabal crime spree that began with the assassination of JFK.
Our Unfinished Work
Activists in the new Citizen Revolution must not forget what we've suffered over the past six years under the Bush junta. Bush II was brought into the presidency in 2000 through a coup d'etat set up by Jeb Bush, Jim Baker,
and the Supreme Court. That changed the entire structure of our government. The 2002 and 2004 presidential elections were
stolen by the Republicans, through the connivance of Karl Rove and his Nazis. The fact that the Democrats became somewhat
vigilant and created election oversight operations in the 2006 election doesn't prove that the Republicans will not succeed in
rigging the 2008 election. Even in the 2006 mid-term election,
it appears that at least four percent of the votes
were "misplaced."
When it comes to the so-called independent and third-party organizations, we find largely an
admixture of
simple-minded hope, unrealistic expectations, and outright fascistic actions.
A review of these so-called independent and alternative parties leaves us with the realization that
not one of them offers a viable strategy for reconstituting America. Most of them are still trying to play in the national arena
against a stacked deck. Their "platforms" indicate that they have no real clue as to what's happening in this country or the
world.
If we wish to reconstitute our nation in a positive
manner, here are groups and initiatives that will move us in that direction:
The 2008 Election in Our Reconstitutive Policy
In whatever way possible in the 2008 elections, we must fight against the insane policies of the
cabal as it attempts to drag the whole world into armed conflagration. When there are positive Democratic candidates in our nation,
state, county, or city elections, we'll want to support and vote for them.
"Our party is intervening in this election to fight for a break with the Democrats and the two-party system and for the
independent political mobilization of the working class. It is stressing that the war, as well as the attacks on democratic
rights and the assault on living standards, is the product of a capitalist economic and political system characterized by an
ever-widening gulf between wealth and poverty.
"The SEP campaign makes clear that our party’s goal is not the reform of capitalism, but rather its replacement with a
socialist system organized to meet the needs of working people, the vast majority of the population, rather than the profit
interests of the financial elite. We insist that this goal can be achieved only in a common struggle of workers in the United
States with workers in every other part of the world."
Bill Van Auken, Socialist Equality Party candidate for US President in 2004, "The International Socialist Organization and the
2006 election," 23 June 2006 |
|
|
In the presidential election, there will not be a single candidate
who'll merit our vote. I'd suggest we select candidates in that and other appropriate races who stand for the values we do:
progressive activism in the cause of working people worldwide. The most intelligent and principled candidates I'm aware of are
those from the Socialist Equality Party (SEP). |

Even though we may have some points of disagreement with the SEP--and I certainly do--they appear to
be the best informed and most progressively principled of all the possible alternative parties now active on the American
political scene. The World Socialist Web Site and the SEP present some of the most astute analysis of world events available
to Americans in their efforts toward reconstitution of our nation.
A Proviso
To some people, these suggestions may seem to be a message of hopelessness. Actually,
it's always much more hopeful to face reality and work toward viable objectives instead of fooling ourselves about what's going on
in America and the world. The election process in the U.S. has been rigged to become a one-party scam and all elections since 2000 have
been stolen by the Republicans, except in 2006 when they made mistakes in their criminal procedures, leading to the
Democrats winning both houses of Congress. We can't hope to change the basic political, economic, or social structures of our
country through this rigged, one-party voting system, but there are a few progressive Democrats in a few states, so it's worthwhile to
work for fair voting to elect those persons.
In the presidential election, there will be no positive candidate, so it's more intelligent to
vote for a progressive candidate with a platform representing the interests of working people. Yes, because the cabal controls and
selects both presidential candidates and makes sure no third-party candidate could ever win, our vote will be entirely
symbolic. But that's better than casting a vote for a cabal factotum. Our efforts look to the long-haul--but with the assurance of inevitable
victory.
Long-Range Strategy for Reconstitution
Our long-range, overall strategy must be to assist in the re-education of the world's
peoples over several generations, helping
them gain the capabilities of:
- Understanding what's happening in the world situation
- Understanding ourselves:
Joining with others to learn the skills of intelligent decision-making
- Forming progressive, activist groups to plan
and carry out citizen-based initiatives to create a commonwealth society.
The World Situation
"Following the end of the Cold War in 1991, no major power, including emerging ones such as China, India and Russia, is capable of
establishing a new equilibrium of world capitalism. On the contrary, their emergence, along with the more aggressive
military posture of imperialist powers such as Germany and Japan, is a profoundly destabilising factor. Far from accepting
a so-called 'multi-polar world,] American [cabal] imperialism is trying to use its residual military might to maintain its hegemonic
position as the sole superpower.
"The prospect of US militarism driving mankind into a global conflagration is not remote. As the Bush administration intensifies
its military escalation in Iraq, it is also threatening a wider regional war against Iran and Syria. To the south, the US has
already started a new adventure in the Horn of Africa by backing the Ethiopian army’s invasion of Somalia. In each of these
regions, the reckless actions of the US are cutting across the essential material interests of other major powers." . . .
"China is promoting itself as a new role model for developing countries, in which dictatorship rather than 'democracy' is
viewed as a crucial component of economic success. This is particularly favoured by various corrupt Third World regimes, which
are under pressure from the Western powers, for their own reasons, to carry out limited political reforms."
John Chan, "China’s economic rise destabilises world capitalism," 19 February 2007, WSWS.Org
|
|
|
At present we're faced with a ruling group that is at
war militarily, economically, and socially with the American people and the rest of the world. The American people as a whole have no
political, economic, or military power against this demonic junta. Other nations--such as China, Russia, or Venezuela--possess
no real force to stop this juggernaut, thought they chip away at it as much as they can.
But no other ruling groups in the world--including Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and his entourage--are completely in support of common people. We the peoples of the world will have to reconstitute our nations; none of our leaders ever
will. |
Understanding Ourselves
Here we run up against the most formidable forces of all: the world-wide pandemics of
egomania and
ignorance. The cabal has created a universal ethos of
capitalistic egocentrism, a dog-eat-dog, me-first, know-nothing,
anti-intellectual ideology that makes it absolutely
impossible for people to understand or join in common cause on any major issue. Ruling groups throughout the world have done a remarkable job
of creating just
the kind of self-obsessed, self-indulgent, "I'm-stupid-and-proud-of-it" masses that make it easy to control them through "bread"
(fast food and authoritarian religion)
and "circuses" (NFL, NBA, World Soccer, World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), right-wing radio, and TV sit-coms).
Egomania, narcissism, is the natural condition of the infant; the world exists merely as gratification or denial of personal
desires. The caretaker--parent, nurse, teacher, religious authority--tells the infant what reality is and how he or she must
behave in response to this defined reality.
It's at this stage of egomania and narcissism where most personalities stop developing; they remain
in an infantile state
even though they've matured physically. Ego-satisfaction is the only concern, avoiding punishment by authority figures
and achieving one's individual goals is the life-game, and understanding or awareness is totally unnecessary and boring.
The authority figures will tell us what is real and what we're supposed to do, so we have absolutely no need to think for
ourselves. Since personal satisfaction is primary, however we achieve our goals is okay. There are no moral values
beyond feeling good about ourselves and making others fear and respect us. Any consideration for the good of others is
weakness and stupidity.
Egomania is not just an arrested stage of development, not merely a slight malady or a minor social aberration; it is a
blindness to reality which leads to death: death of oneself and others. The obsession with self and the grudging obedience
to authority becomes so pervasive and consuming that we lose touch with reality and begin to live in solipsistic fantasy worlds.
The infantile personality responds only to gross symbols, ideas, and commands: TV images of 200% patriotism, slogans
("dead or alive), bluster ("we'll rid the world of terrorism"); norms ("don't think about what American leaders did which led
to the terrorist attacks; vote more money for an incompetent intelligence industry; forget about the workers laid off, give
tax breaks to corporate executives"). American immaturity is clear from the unthinking, knee-jerk early (and continuing) approval
of a president who stole the presidency and can barely read his speeches from his cue cards.
To reconstitute our nation, we must recognize and acknowledge the egomaniacal, anti-intellectual,
ignorance-embracing
character of a large percentage of Americans. Because they eagerly pursue ignorance--by listening to people who lie to them and
brainwash them with false information--these people can't credit the fact that
our country has been taken over by a gang of thugs. They still believe the myth that this country is a democracy and that
the President is a benevolent leader. We see this
on TV and radio "talk shows," where people ask such
inane questions as this:
- "Why doesn't the President do something to improve the situation in Iraq and to improve the plight of
the American working-class citizen?"
This crook, who stole the presidency through a conspiracy contrived by his brother and the Supreme Court, doesn't want to improve things for common people in Iraq or America;
he's only interested in the upper 1% of wealthy people who put him into power and keep him there. How many times do we have to
see his total indifference to the plight of
ordinary Americans in such actions as the Katrina disaster or the placing of wounded veterans in mice-infested hospitals to get this into our heads?
- "Why is America remaining in Iraq and threatening to go to war with Iran?"
America isn't doing any of that; the cabal through its puppet president is perpetrating these outrages. The American people in
the 2006 mid-term election made it clear that it wants the U.S. out of Iraq and doesn't want another war. But Vice President Cheney
makes it clear that neither he nor the President listen to the people. Cheney says they don't listen to the people
because they're stupid and cowardly and won't stay the course in Iraq. Real leaders, Cheney boasts, do what they want to and never
consider what the people want.
- Surely a president and an entire administration can't be so ruthless and soulless as you make them out to be; they must have
some sense of decency and concern for human beings?
Their actions prove that they're totally ruthless and soulless, without a shred of
moral integrity or fellow-feeling.
If you choose to hide your head in the sands of ignorance, you're deliberately committing
suicide. Over 4,000 Americans and a million Iraqis have already died in the cabal's war-profiteering slaughter. America has been turned into a
burnt-out war zone of unemployment and poverty. If you choose to believe that the Iraq war is going well--as Cheney tells us--and that
the U.S. economy is strong--as Bush tells us--then you deserve what you get.
Effective Action